Economic feasibility of gasification scenarios in remote areas (the case of Sverdlovsk region, Russia)
Abstract
Relevance. Structural changes in the Russian market create new trends, including energy supply in remote areas. The government is planning to redirect natural gas to domestic buyers. However, according to the estimates of biogas potential, it can fully meet the energy needs of households with no access to centralized gas supply.
Research objective is to choose the optimal scenario of gasification in remote areas by evaluating the economic feasibility of several alternatives, including biogas technologies and the centralized gas supply system.
Data and methods. The study focuses on the case of Sverdlovsk region and considers three scenarios of gasification in its remote areas. The method includes the calculation of the full discounted value of energy facilities, the comparison of their productive capacity, the analysis of the key external factors.
Results. In terms of cost, the most economically feasible is the scenario of biogas plants using by individual households. However, accounting productivity, the scenarios based on the use of centralized gas supply or collective biogas plants. The economic feasibility of these two scenarios depends on the number of buildings serviced.
Conclusions. The optimal scenario is the centralized gas supply. Despite its high costs, it can ensure the uninterrupted supply of the necessary energy amount to private households and does not depend on factors such as the availability of manure and organic waste and weather conditions. One more advantage is that Russia currently has a more elaborate and adequate legal framework regulating its use than for the other two options.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adefarati, T. & Obikoya, G.D. (2020). Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Standalone Microgrid System. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 46, 146-167. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.46.146
Allouhi, A. (2019). Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental (4 E) assessment process of wind power generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 123-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.299
Anwar, Y.A., Shafei, M.A.R. & Ibrahim, D.K. (2018). An Economic Analysis of Rooftop Solar Power Plant and Energy Auditing for Commercial Building in Egypt. 2017 Saudi Arabia Smart Grid Conference, 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/SASG.2017.8356490
Arifulova, D. & Reshetova, E. (2017). Import Substitution Industrialization in Power Engineering Industry. Vestnik Universiteta, 12, 64-71. DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2017-12-64-71 (In Russ.)
Ayodele, T.R., Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Alao, M.A. (2018). Economic and environmental assessment of electricity generation using biogas from organic fraction of municipal solid waste for the city of Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 718-735. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.282
Belinskiy, A.V. (2018). Influence of the gas supply and the gas infrastructure development on economic growth of regions of the Russian Federation (econometric approach). GAS Industry of Russia, S2(770), 6-13. (In Russ.)
Briones-Hidrovo, A., Uche, J. & Martínez-Gracia, A. (2019). Estimating the hidden ecological costs of hydropower through an ecosystem services balance: A case study from Ecuador. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 33-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.068
Caglayan, D.G., Ryberg, D.S., Heinrichs, H., Linssen, J., Stolten, D. & Robinius, M. (2019). The techno-economic potential of offshore wind energy with optimized future turbine designs in Europe. Applied Energy, 255, 113794. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113794
Campello, L.D., Barros, R.M., Tiago Filho, G.L. & dos Santos, I.F.S. (2021). Analysis of the economic viability of the use of biogas produced in wastewater treatment plants to generate electrical energy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(2), 2614 – 2629. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00689-y
Carpio, R.R., Secchi, S.G., Barros, R.O., Oliveira, R.A., Queiroz, S., Teixeira, R.S.S., Bon, E.P.S. & Secchi, A.R. (2022). Techno-economic evaluation of second-generation ethanol from sugarcane bagasse: Commercial versus on-site produced enzymes and use of the xylose liquor. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3691, 133340. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133340
Chebotareva, G.S. & Dvinayninov, A.A. (2021). An economic alternative to replacing centralized gas supply with autonomous biogas facilities in Russian cities. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 20(3), 582-612. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.023. (In Russ.)
Collins, S., Deane, P., Ó Gallachóir, B., Pfenninger, S. & Staffell, I. (2018). Impacts of Inter-Annual Wind and Solar Variations on the European Power System. Joule, 2(10), 2076-2090. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.020
Diemuodeke, E.O., Addo, A., Oko, C.O.C., Mulugetta, Y. & Ojapah, M.M. (2019). Optimal Mapping of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Locations Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Algorithm. Renewable Energy, 134, 461-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.055
Duman, A.C. & Guler, O. (2018). Techno-Economic Analysis of Off-Grid PV/Wind/Fuel Cell Hybrid System Combinations with a Comparison of Regularly and Seasonally Occupied Households. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, 107-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.029
Gebrehiwot, K., Mondal, M.A.H., Ringler, C. & Gebremeskel, A.G. (2019). Optimization and cost-benefit assessment of hybrid power systems for off-grid rural electrification in Ethiopia. Energy, 177, 234-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.095
Karmaker, A.K., Ahmed, M.R., Hossain, M.A. & Sikder, M.M. (2018). Feasibility Assessment and Design of Hybrid Renewable Energy Based Electric Vehicle Charging Station in Bangladesh. Sustainable Cities and Society, 39, 189-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.035
Kezembayeva, G.B. (2018). Development of methods for calculating the environmental and economic efficiency of waste treatment technologies. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 9(7), 1624-1630. DOI: 10.14505/jemt.v9.7(31).25
Kozarcanin, S., Liu, H. & Andresen, G.B. (2019). 21st Century Climate Change Impacts on Key Properties of a Large-Scale Renewable-Based Electricity System. Joule, 3(4), 992–1005. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.001
Kozhevnikov, M.V. & Dvinyaninov A.A. (2020). Small-Scale Energy Equipment Manufacturing in Russia Under the Import Substitution Conditions. ECO, 5(551), 99-120. DOI: 10.30680/ЕСО0131-7652-2020-5-99-120. (In Russ.)
Landi, D., Castorani, V. & Germani, M. (2019). Interactive energetic, environmental and economic analysis of renewable hybrid energy system. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 13(3), 885-899. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-019-00554-x
Li, T., Gao, R. & Gao, X. (2022). Energy, exergy, economic, and environment (4E) assessment of trans-critical organic Rankine cycle for combined heating and power in wastewater treatment plant. Energy Conversion and Management, 2671, 115932, DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115932
Mehrpooya, M., Mohammadi, M. & Ahmadi, E. (2018). Techno-economic-environmental study of hybrid power supply system: A case study in Iran. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 25, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2017.10.007
Nieves, J.A., Aristizabal, A.J., Dyner, I., Baez, O. & Ospina, D.H. (2019). Energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions analysis in Colombia: A LEAP model application. Energy, 169, 380-397. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.051
Park, Y.S., Egilmez, G. & Kucukvar, M. (2016). Emergy and end-point impact assessment of agricultural and food production in the United States: A supply chain-linked Ecologically-based Life Cycle Assessment. Ecological Indicators, 62, 117–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.045.
Rentizelas, A., Melo, I.C., Alves Junior, P.N., Campoli, J.S. & Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto, D. (2019). Multi-criteria efficiency assessment of international biomass supply chain pathways using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117690. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117690
Sales Silva, S.T., Barros, R.M., Silva dos Santos, I.F., Maria de Cassia Crispim, A., Tiago Filho, G.L. & Silva Lora, E.E. (2022). Technical and economic evaluation of using biomethane from sanitary landfills for supplying vehicles in the Southeastern region of Brazil. Renewable Energy, 196, 1142 – 1157. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.07.020.
Sassanelli, C., Rosa, P., Rocca, R. & Terzi, S. (2019). Circular economy performance assessment methods: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 440-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019
Storonsky, N.M., Sukharev, M.G., Samoylov, R.V., Tverskoy, I.V. & Acosta, A.A. (2021). Current issues of gasification development and prospective gas demand assessment when updating general schemes of gas supply and gasification of the regions. GAS Industry of Russia, 10(822), 88-96. (In Russ.)
Thao, N.T.T., Hieu, T.T., Thao, N.T.P., Vi, L.Q., Schnitzer, H., Son, L.T., Braunegg, G., Braunegg, S. & Hai, L.T. (2022). An economic–environmental–energy efficiency analysis for optimizing organic waste treatment of a livestock-orchard system: a case in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 12(1), 25. DOI: 10.1186/s13705-022-00347-3
Trovato, V. & Kantharaj, B. (2020). Energy storage behind-the-meter with renewable generators: Techno-economic value of optimal imbalance management. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 118, 105813. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105813
Wang, J., Chai, Y., Shao, Y. & Qian, X. (2021). Techno-economic Assessment of Biogas Project: a Longitudinal Case Study from Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 164, 105174. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020
Wang, X., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Wu, X. & Xiong, J. (2014). Efficiency and sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: An emergy evaluation based on LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 234-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.001
Zhang, C. & Yang, J. (2019). Economic benefits assessments of “coal-to-electricity” project in rural residents heating based on life cycle cost. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 217-224. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.077
Zhu, K., Victoria, M., Andresen, G.B. & Greiner, M. (2020). Impact of climatic, technical and economic uncertainties on the optimal design of a coupled fossil-free electricity, heating and cooling system in Europe. Applied Energy, 262, 114500. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114500
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.1.001
Copyright (c) 2023 Galina S. Chebotareva, Artyom A. Dvinayninov
Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 28.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731