The problem of definition and calculation of the social discount rate for government financing of social projects at the regional level
Abstract
Relevance. The study’s relevance stems from the need to resolve a fundamental contradiction in spatially distributed state financing to prevent inefficient resource allocation and reduce inequality.
Research Objective. The study seeks to examine specialized theories and present a practical approach to estimating the social discount rate for the effective implementation of state social policy and public financing.
Data and Methods. The study relies on mathematical modeling in combination with comparative and statistical analysis of empirical data, while theoretical and interpretive approaches provide the basis for justifying the chosen calculation model (intertemporal preferences) and critically evaluating the results. This integrated approach was used to calculate and assess the social discount rate for 85 Russian regions.
Results. The study highlights the theoretical and heuristic differences among approaches to estimating the social discount rate, explaining why the intertemporal preference method is most appropriate and distinguishing between stationary and non-stationary economic assessments. It provides an objective interpretation of the Ramsey formula parameters, grounded in primary sources and mathematical constructs. Social discount rate values were calculated for Russian regions, revealing spatial variation and a notable discrepancy between the calculated mean rate (4.26%) and the Central Bank’s key rate (18%).
Conclusions. The proposed methodology for calculating a differentiated social discount rate for each Russian region enables a shift from a uniform approach to a targeted evaluation of social investment effectiveness. In other words, it provides a practical tool to support more informed and equitable budget policy decisions under present economic conditions.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arrow K. J.& Lind R. C. (1978). Uncertainty and the evaluation of public investment decisions. Uncertainty in economics. Academic Press, 403-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-214850-7.50031-0.
Acland D.& Greenberg D. H. (2023). The Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Income for Distributional Weighting and Social Discounting: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis. 14(2),386-405. https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2023.29
Adler Matthew D. (2019). Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction (New York, online edn, Oxford Academic), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190643027.001.0001
Broome J. (1992). Counting the cost of global warming: A report to the Economic and Social Research Council on research by John Broome and David Ulph. ISBN(s) 1874267006. 9781874267003.
Chenery H. B. (1953). The application of investment criteria. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 67, 1, 76-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884149.
Eden M. (2023). The Cross-Sectional Implications of the Social Discount Rate. Econometrica. 91, 2065-2088. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA20844
Eckstein O. (1957). Investment criteria for economic development and the theory of intertemporal welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71, 1, 56-85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882296.
Gravelle Hugh & Smith Dave. (2001). Discounting for Health Effects in Cost Benefit and Cost Effectiveness Analysis. Health economics. 10, 587-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.618.
Joonhyuk Song. (2017). Revisiting the social discount rate for public investments in the context of sustainable development goals. KDI Journal of Economic Policy, 39, 2, 75-98. https://doi.org/10.23895/kdijep.2017.39.2.75
Hicks J. R. (1988). Value and Capital. Transl. from English/General Ed. and Introduction by R. M. Entova. M. Progress. 488 p.
Khairullin V. A., Akhundov E. R., Kuznetsov D. V.& Zentsov V. N. (2021). Assessment of the social and budgetary effect in the implementation of cost-based investment projects in construction. Kazan. Limited Liability Company "Buk". 226 p. ISBN 978-5-00118-689-2. EDN UJFIKO.
Khairullin V. A., Makar S. V., Yamalova E. N.& Asadullin M. R. (2021). Social Discount Rate, Social Effect, and Implementation of National Development Goals in Russia. Discussion. 4(107), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.46320/2077-7639-2021-4-107-79-91. EDN MBHDTX.
Khairullin V. A.& Shakirova E. V. (2012). Social discount rate in the development of investments in social projects of the fuel and energy complex of the Republic of Bashkortostan. Oil and Gas Business, 10, 3, 193-199. EDN UNNKUX.
Marglin S. A. (1963). The opportunity costs of public investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 77, 2, 274-289. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884403.
Marglin S. A. (1963) The social rate of discount and the optimal rate of investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 77, 1, 95-111. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879374.
Moore M.& Vining A. (2018). The social rate of time preference and the social discount rate. Mercatus Research Paper. Available at: https://www.mercatus.org/research/research-papers/social-rate-time-preference-and-social-discount-rate. (access date 03.05.2025)
Pearce D.& Ulph D. (1995). A social discount rate for the United Kingdom. Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment University College London and University of East Anglia. Available at: https://docplayer.net/12997251-A-social-discount-rate-for-the-united-kingdom-david-pearce-and-david-ulph-cserge-working-paper-gec-95-01.html (access date 03.05.2025)
Pigou A. (1985). Welfare Economics. Vol. 1. Translated from English. Moscow, Progress. 30 p. Available at: http://lib.ysu.am/open_books/417047_1.pdf (access date 05.03.2025).
Ramsey F. P. (1928). A Mathematical Theory of Saving. The Economic Journal, 38, 152, 543-559. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2224098, (access date 03.05.2025)
Robinson J. C. (1990). Philosophical origins of the social rate of discount in cost-benefit analysis. The Milbank Quarterly. P. 245-265. https://doi.org/10.2307/3350098.
Robinson J. V. (1986). Economic Theory of Imperfect Competition. Moscow, Progress. 471 p.
Scasny M. & Opatrny M. (2022). New Estimate of the Elasticity of Marginal Utility of Consumption for Europe: Implications for the Social Discount Rate. Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies No. 2022/29.
Scott M.F.G. (1989). A New View of Economic Growth. Oxford University Press. pp. 1-592. Available at: https://ru.scribd.com/document/423541810/A-New-View-of-Economic-Growth (access date 03.05.2025).
Slutsky E. E. (2010). Economic and Statistical Works. M. Eksmo. 1152 p.
Slutsky. E. E. (2016). On the Theory of a Balanced Consumer Budget. Bulletin of Moscow University. Economy. 4, (6), 86-111. Available at: https://www.econ.msu.ru/sys/raw.php?o=32812&p=attachment (access date 05.03.2025).
Spackman M. (2004). Time discounting and of the cost of capital in government. Fiscal Studies,25, 4 , 467-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2004.tb00547.x.
Sumina E. E. (2015). Problems of discount rate calculation in the domestic financial accounting. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 16(20), 3461-3466. https://doi.org/10.18334/rp.16.20.2008
Sterner Th, U.& Persson M. (2008). An Even Sterner Review: Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2, 1, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rem024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2025.11.4.027
Copyright (c) 2025 Vitaly A. Khairullin, Petr V. Alekseev, Larisa G. Chuvakhina
Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 23.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731
