Application of the concept of technological maturity in regional industrial development strategy-making

Olga A. Chernova, Vladislav R. Knyazev

Abstract


Relevance. Technological sovereignty in the national economy cannot be achieved without a clear understanding of the state of regional industries, particularly their level of technological maturity. This crucial factor drives investment decisions and shapes regional development strategies. However, existing methods for assessing technological development often fail to account for industries' reliance on foreign technologies and services.

Research Objective. The study explores the concept of technological maturity in the context of managing regional industrial development, focusing on the case of regional industries in Russia.

Data and Methods. To evaluate the technological maturity of regional industries, we propose an index derived from normalizing key indicators that capture the critical aspects of technological maturity. The normalized indicators are aggregated using the arithmetic mean. Correlation analysis was employed to identify factors influencing technological development. The study is based on official statistics from the Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) for 2022.

Results. Technological maturity indices are calculated for Russian regions, identifying both strengths and weaknesses. Only nine regions have achieved a medium level of technological maturity, while most remain at low levels. Additionally, many regions leading in terms of technology are highly reliant on imported technologies and services, with minimal exports of domestically developed technologies. These results highlight the need for policy measures tailored to regions’ varying needs and levels of technological maturity.

Conclusions The concept of technological maturity provides a strategic framework for regional industrial development that can enhance national economic competitiveness through both embracing modern technologies and ensuring technological independence. The technological maturity index provides a valuable tool for tracking key indicators of technological sovereignty in domestic industries and identifying investment priorities to strengthen it.


Keywords


regional industry, technological sovereignty, regional development strategy, technological maturity index, industrial economics, investment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abramov, V. I. & Andreev, V. D. (2023). Analysis of digital transformation strategies in Russia's regions in the context of national goal achievement. Public Administration Issues, 1, 89-119. https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-1-89-119 (In Russ.)

Altunok, T.& Cakmak, T. (2010). A technology readiness levels (TRLs) calculator software for systems engineering and technology management tool. Advances in Engineering Software, 41 (5), 769-778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.12.018

Balkan, D.& Akyüz, G. (2023). Technological maturity of the OECD countries: A multi-criteria decision-making approach using PROMETHEE. Cogent Engineering, 10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2023.2219097

Bharosa, N. (2022) The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 39 (3), 101692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101692

Chernova, O., Mitrofanova, I., Pleshakova, M. & Batmanova, V. (2023). Use of big data analytics for small and medium sized businesses. Serbian Journal of Management, 18, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm18-41822

Damianou, A., Vayona, A., Demetriou, G. & Katos, V. (2023). An actionable maturity planning model for smart, circular cities. Cities, 140, 104403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104403

Degtyarev, M. V. (2022). Concept and technologies of intelligent regulation. Agrarian and Land Law, 5 (209), 141-145. https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1329_2022_5_141 (In Russ.)

Drapkin, I., Vasilyeva, R., Kandalintseva, A. (2024). Determinants of high-tech export: evidence from a crosscountry analysis. R-Economy, 10 (1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2024.10.1.003

Egorov, N. E.& Kovrov, G. S. (2023). Analysis of ranking methods for assessing the scientific and technological development of federal districts of Russia. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 14 (4), 698-715. https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.4.698-715 (In Russ.)

Ferreira, D., de Gusmão, A.& de Almeida, J. (2024). A multicriteria model for assessing maturity in industry 4.0 context. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 38, 100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2024.100579

Gajdzik, B. (2022). Frameworks of the Maturity Model for Industry 4.0 with Assessment of Maturity Levels on the Example of the Segment of Steel Enterprises in Poland, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology. Market, and Complexity, 8 (2), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020077

Glazyev, S. Yu.& Sukharev, O. S. (2024) Economic growth in Russia and structural modernization: a project-based approach. Russian Economic Journal, 2, 4-30 (In Russ.)

Haraguchi, M., Funahashi, T.& Biljecki, F. (2024). Assessing governance implications of city digital twin technology: A maturity model approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 204, 123409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123409

Lemos, J.& Chagas, M. (2016). Application of maturity assessment tools in the innovation process: converting system's emergent properties into technological knowledge. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13 (2), 145-153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2015.08.001

Naumov, I. V.& Nikulina, N. L. (2023). Exploring the Innovative Development of Russian Regions: A Spatial Regression Analysis Using the Cobb-Douglas Model. R-Economy, 9(2), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.2.014

Nikitaeva, A.Yu., Chernova, O.A.& Molapisi, L. (2022). Smart territories as a driver for the transition to sustainable regional development and green economy. R-economy, 8(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2022.8.2.010

Noh, H., Mortara, L., Lee, S. (2023). Development of a maturity model for technology intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122525

Ovchinnikova, O. P.& Kharlamov, M. M. (2022). Digital maturity of a core city enterprise: assessment and its impact on regional development. Economy of Regions, 18 (4), 1249-1262. https://doi.org//10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-4-20 (In Russ.)

Pinto, M., Salume, P., Barbosa, M.& de Sousa, P. (2023). The path to digital maturity: A cluster analysis of the retail industry in an emerging economy. Technology in Society, 72, 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102191

Rocha, D., Araujo, G.L.V., Melo, F.C.L. (2022). Maturity Assessment of Critical Technologies. Foresight and STI Governance, 16(4), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.71.81

Rostovskaya, T. K.& Zolotareva, O. A. (2022). Transition to a New Technological Paradigm as a Determinant of the Population Welfare Growth in Russian Regions. Economy of regions, 18(3), 623-637. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-3-1

Salvador-Carulla, L., Woods, C., de Miquel, C.& Lukersmith, S. (2024). Adaptation of the technology readiness levels for impact assessment in implementation sciences: The TRL-IS checklist. Heliyon, 10 (9), e29930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29930

Silberer, J., Astfalk, S., Planing, P.& Müller, P. (2023). User needs over time: the market and technology maturity model (MTMM). Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00302-2

Sipthorpe, A., Brink, S., Van Leeuwen, T., Staffell, I. (2022). Blockchain solutions for carbon markets are nearing maturity. One Earth, 5 (7), 779-791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.004

Solis, M.& Silveira, S. (2020). Technologies for chemical recycling of household plastics – A technical review and TRL assessment. Waste Management, 105, 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.038

Sukharev, O. S. (2024). Technological substitution: The key control modes. The Manager, 15 (2), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2024-15-2-5

Suprun, E., Roumi, S., Mohamed, Sh.& Stewart, R. (2024). Digital transformation maturity assessment framework for large infrastructure asset owners. Digital Engineering, 1, 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dte.2024.100003

Tetlay, A.& John, P. (2009). Determining the lines of system maturity, system readiness and capability readiness in the system development life cycle. 7th Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER), 1-8

Turgel, I. D., Panzabekova, A. Z.& Symaniuk, N. V. (2020). Arrangement of the national systems of regulatory impact assessment: experience of Russia, Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 5, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518–1467.160

Uflewska, O., Wong, T.& Ward, M. (2017). Development of technology maturity framework in managing manufacturing improvement for innovation providers. 24th Innovation and Product Development Management Conference - Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland. URL: https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/61013/1/Uflewska_etal_IPDM_2017_technology_maturity_framework_in_managing_manufacturing_improvement.pdf

Volkova, N. N. & Romanyuk, E. I. (2023). Rating of scientific and technological development of the subjects of the Russian Federation. The Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.52180/2073-6487_2023_2_50_72 (In Russ.)

Xing, Z., Fang, D., Wang, J.& Zhang, L. (2024). Digital technology and industry-university-research (IUR) R&D network configurations: An exploration of market participation and market maturity. Technology in Society, 78, 102595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102595

Zhanbozova, A. B., Turgel, I. D.& Azatbek, T. A. (2021). Composite Index for Evaluating the B2C E-Commerce Development in the EAEU Countries. Economy of regions, 17(4), 1332-1345. https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-4-20

Zuluaga, J., Escobar, J., Martínez, G., D'Aleman, J.& Vallejo, A. (2024). Model for measuring technological maturity for critical sector industries. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10 (1), 100194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100194




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2024.10.4.027

Copyright (c) 2025 Olga A. Chernova, Vladislav R. Knyazev

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 23.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731