National adaptive social well-being index for measuring regional disparities in Kazakhstan

Azimkhan A. Satybaldin, Aisulu Moldabekova, Gulnaz Zh. Alibekova, Tolkyn Azatbek

Abstract


Relevance. The well-being of citizens is a key focus of national policies worldwide. Kazakhstan, however, is characterized by significant regional disparities in social well-being, which necessitates targeted programs and investments to improve conditions in less developed areas.

Research Objective. This study aims to develop a national adaptive social well-being index to evaluate and spatially map the regions of Kazakhstan.

Data and Methods. The methodology included identifying indicators through a literature review and regional data, conducting an expert survey to weight them, and creating a social well-being index. A spatial analysis was then used to calculate the index for each region.

Results. The social well-being index shows significant disparities across regions. Astana, Almaty, and Atyrau demonstrate strong social welfare, driven by economic growth and advanced social infrastructure. In contrast, Karaganda, Pavlodar, and Shymkent show lower social welfare, highlighting the need for targeted interventions and investments.

Conclusion. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers to design strategies for sustainable socioeconomic growth in Kazakhstan. The proposed index can help national and regional authorities monitor social well-being.


Keywords


social well-being, regional disparities, adaptive index, well-being index, measuring well-being, spatial de-velopment, socio-economic development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahern, J. (2011). From Fail-Safe to Safe-to-Fail: Sustainability and Resilience in the New Urban World. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 341-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021

Bagstad, K.J., & Shammin, M.R. (2012). Can the Genuine Progress Indicator Better Inform Sustainable Regional Progress? A Case Study for Northeast Ohio. Ecological Indicators, 18, 330-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.11.026

Boyce, C.J., Wood, A.M., Banks, J., Clark, A.E., & Brown, G.D. (2013). Money, Well-Being, and Loss Aversion: Does an Income Loss Have a Greater Effect on Well-Being than an Equivalent Income Gain? Psychological Science, 24, 2557-2562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613496436

Britton, E., & Coulthard, S. (2013). Assessing the Social Wellbeing of Northern Ireland’s Fishing Society Using a Three-Dimensional Approach. Marine Policy, 37(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.04.011

Cai, J., Neszmélyi, G.I., & László, V. (2023). Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Development of Selected Chinese Provinces. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 10(3), 542-556. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i3.1200

Calcagnini, G., & Perugini, F. (2019). Social Capital and Well-Being in the Italian Provinces. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 68, 100668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.11.005

Charles, V., & D’Alessio, F.A. (2020). An Envelopment-Based Approach to Measuring Regional Social Progress. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 70, 100713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.05.004

Čižo, E., Mietule, I., Kokarevica, A., Ostrovska, I., & Komarova, V. (2023). Changes in Wealth Inequality in the Modern Euro-American Civilization. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 10(3), 439-454. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i3.1217

Dermatis, Z., Kalligosfyris, C., Kalamara, E., & Anastasiou, A. (2024). Mapping EU Member States’ Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis. Economies, 12(7), 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12070158.

Fioramonti, L., Coscieme, L., & Mortensen, L.F. (2019). From Gross Domestic Product to Wellbeing: How Alternative Indicators Can Help Connect the New Economy with the Sustainable Development Goals. Anthropocene Review, 6(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019619869947

Glazyrina, I.P., & Zabelina, I.A. (2021). An Assessment of the Regional Development Well-Being Taking into Account the Environmental Component. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 629(1), 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/629/1/012019

Greblikaitė, J., Butkus, E., & Svirina, R. (2018). Complex Assessment of Social Welfare: Methodological Approach. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 6(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.2478/fso-2018-0006

Hassad de Andrade, L., Antunes, J.J.M., Araújo de Medeiros, A.M., Wanke, P., & Nunes, B.P. (2022). The Impact of Social Welfare and COVID-19 Stringency on the Perceived Utility of Food Apps: A Hybrid MCDM Approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101299

Iacus, S.M., Porro, G., & Ceron, G. (2022). Using Social Networks to Measure Subjective Well-Being. Significance, 19(3), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2022.01443.x

Ko, S., & Lee, D. (2021). Effectiveness of Green Infrastructure Location Based on a Social Well-Being Index. Sustainability, 13(17), 9620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179620

Kurniasih, D. (2023). Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research Vol. 10 No. 1. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 10(1), 104-113. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i1.1068

Lawless, N.M., & Lucas, R.E. (2011). Predictors of Regional Well-Being: A County Level Analysis. Social Indicators Research, 101(3), 341-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9667-7

Livingston, V., Jackson-Nevels, B., & Reddy, V.V. (2022). Social, Cultural, and Economic Determinants of Well-Being. Encyclopedia, 2(3), 1183-1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia2030079Long, Xianling, and Xi Ji. "Economic Growth Quality, Environmental Sustainability, and Social Welfare in China - Provincial Assessment Based on Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI)." Ecological Economics 159 (2019): 157-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.002.

Lukman, A.E.S., Dwiningtias, K., Luksita, A.C., & Narmaditya, B.S. (2023). Human Development Index, Good Governance Practice and Export: Evidence From ASEAN Countries. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 10(3), 468-477. https://doi.org/10.15549/jeecar.v10i3.1230

Malkina, M.Yu. (2015). Study of the Factors of Interregional Convergence/Divergence in Real Incomes and Social Well-Being of Russian Regions. Journal of Economic Regulation, 6(4), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.17835/2078-5429.2015.6.4.111-119

Malkina, M. (2016). Evaluation of the Social Well-Being of Russian Regions, the Level and Dynamics of Inter-Regional Disparities Based on a Welfare Functions. Terra Economicus, 14(3), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2016-14-3-29-49

Pérez, J.A.H., Briceño Avalos, H.R., Vargas Salazar, C.S., & Carrasco Mamani. (2024). Social Programs and Socioeconomic Variables: Their Impact on Peruvian Regional Poverty (2013–2022). Economies, 12(8), 197. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12080197

Pontin, E., Schwannauer, M., Tai, S., & Kinderman, P. (2013). A UK Validation of a General Measure of Subjective Well-Being: The Modified BBC Subjective Well-Being Scale (BBC-SWB). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-150

Seabela, M., Ogujiuba, K., & Eggink, M. (2024). Determinants of Income Inequality in South Africa: A Vector Error Correction Model Approach. Economies, 12(7), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12070169

Segre, E., Rondinella, T., & Mascherini, M. (2011). Well-Being in Italian Regions: Measures, Civil Society Consultation and Evidence. Social Indicators Research, 102(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9716-9

Singh, S. (2016). Evaluation of World’s Largest Social Welfare Scheme: An Assessment Using Non-Parametric Approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 57, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.01.005

Slesnick, D.T. (2020). GDP and Social Welfare: An Assessment Using Regional Data. In B.M. Fraumeni (Ed.), Measuring Economic Growth and Productivity (pp. 481-508). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817596-5.00021-4

Strezov, V., Evans, T.J., & Evans, T.J. (2017). Assessment of the Economic, Environmental and Social Indicators of Sustainable Development: A Review. Sustainable Development, 25(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1601.

Temerbulatova, Z., Mukhamediyev, B., Zhidebekkyzy, A., & Bilan, S. (2024). Regional Disparities and Dual Dynamics: Economic Growth and Income Inequality in Kazakhstan. Economics and Sociology, 17(2), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2024/17-2/12.

Torres, P., & Augusto, M. (2020). Digitalisation, Social Entrepreneurship and National Well-Being. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120279.

Venkataramanan, V., Packman, A.I., Peters, D.R., Lopez, D., McCuskey, D.J., & McDonald, R.I. (2019). A Systematic Review of the Human Health and Social Well-Being Outcomes of Green Infrastructure for Stormwater and Flood Management. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 868-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.028.

Zahra, S.A., Newey, L.R., & Li, Y. (2014). On the Frontiers: The Implications of Social Entrepreneurship for International Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(1), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12061.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2024.10.4.024

Copyright (c) 2025 Azimkhan A. Satybaldin, Aisulu Moldabekova, Gulnaz Zh. Alibekova, Tolkyn Azatbek

Сertificate of registration media Эл № ФС77-80764 от 23.04.2021
Online ISSN 2412-0731